Firstly, I'll share the book description for this version of Pride & Prejudice with you, and then hand over to Sophie for her guest post.
Book Description
The novel needs no introduction. But readers may not have realised that we have been losing “Pride and Prejudice” over the years, particularly digitally. Grammar, spelling, and punctuation have eroded significantly from the 1813 Egerton first edition, and many digital copies suffer from poor formatting.
In 2017, the 200th anniversary of Jane Austen’s death, her “darling Child” has been painstakingly restored to the three-volume 1813 first edition. Adjustments have only been made where there were errors in the 1813 text, and are noted in detailed annotations at the end of the novel.
Please enjoy this beloved story, restored to Jane Austen’s original voice.
Guest Post from Sophie Turner
Thank you so much for
having me back here at Babblings of a Bookworm, Ceri! I’m really excited to be
here talking about this project, to produce a digital edition of Pride and
Prejudice restored to the 1813 Egerton first edition, save errors. In my
last post, at My Love for Jane Austen, I wrote about the publication
process, both of that first edition, and of this digital edition. Today I’d
like to delve a little more into the economics of publishing that first
edition.
Jane Austen sold the
copyright of Northanger Abbey for £10 to printer Benjamin Crosby, who
never set the book in type (ultimately, many years later, he sold it back for
the same amount, without knowing it was by the author of novels that were by
that time quite successful). Perhaps this was why she chose to fund the
printing of Sense and Sensibility; it meant taking on more risk for
herself (and her brothers), but had greater certainty of its actually getting
into print. The £180 she spent in publishing (via Thomas Egerton) 750 copies in
its first run did turn out to be money well spent, for it sold out and earned
her about £140.
This is where the
tragedy comes in. Before she knew of the success of Sense and Sensibility,
Austen sold the copyright for Pride and Prejudice to Egerton, for £110;
she had been hoping for £150, but accepted Egerton’s first offer. It was not an
insubstantial sum, for a woman who had significantly less than that per year,
for her personal expenses, but tragic when you consider how little she made
from a book with such enduring popularity.
While I was
researching historical covers for my guest post at My Vices & Weaknesses, the thing that astounded me was the
sheer number of editions that have been published of this novel. Indeed, it has
never been out of print, and has sold 20 million copies worldwide. While the
exact size of the initial printing is unknown, it’s probably somewhere between
the 750 from S&S, and Emma’s 2,000. Whatever the number, it
is entirely dwarfed by what has come since.
It was Egerton,
therefore, who profited from the second printing, which came later in 1813, and
the third, in 1817, and not Austen. Then again, it might have been worse.
Austen’s father had attempted to publish First Impressions, that first
version of the novel, at the author’s expense, via Cadell and Davies, in 1797.
This effort was unsuccessful, but what if it had been successful? We can never
know exactly what similarity this version bore to what was finally published,
but I suspect that save the work Austen did in seeing it “lopt & cropt” to
the perfect pacing of the version we know, it would not have been as
successful. Possibly, if in the epistolary format as some think, it
might have done well for the time. But I do not think it would have had the
enduring popularity it does today, in such a format.
How did the rest of
Austen’s novels fare? Well, she never again sold her copyrights, but the
ambitious printing of Emma did not immediately pay off, and the second
printing of Mansfield Park also sold slowly. As James Raven records,
Murray had offered her £450 for the copyrights to Sense and Sensibility,
Mansfield Park, and Emma, and in hindsight she would have been
slightly better off in taking it. She made £684 13s from her work during her
lifetime, and subtracting out the initial money earned from S&S and P&P,
this means she would have been slightly better than 15 pounds up, if she had
sold the copyrights.
I expect that the
experience of Pride and Prejudice influenced her in this decision,
however, and unfortunately it seems she sold and did not sell at the wrong
times. Indeed the best deal she might have made was to purchase back Northanger
Abbey, although even that she did not profit from within her lifetime.
What did it cost as a
reader, to buy Pride and Prejudice? 18 shillings, in boards (for more on
what that means, check out my covers post). This would have been between about 8-10% of the
income for a housemaid, and 1.8% of Elizabeth Bennet’s income if she had been
living on those 50 pounds per year she was to inherit. People of such incomes
would rarely—if ever—buy books; they would have read Pride and Prejudice
through a subscription to a circulating library (hopefully without horrifying
their odd parson cousins, of course). Your Mr. Darcy types would have easily
paid the 18 shillings, and then paid still more to have the volumes rebound in
leather, to match their un-neglected libraries.
Interestingly Raven
writes that the cost of books increased from 1785 to 1810, due in part to the
increase of labour costs, but more because the cost of paper increased. Sense
and Sensibility in 1811 had cost 15 shillings, but Pride and Prejudice
was three shillings more. This is more for a historian to research, rather than
myself, but I do wonder if the general shortage of timber played a role. This
was at the height of the Napoleonic wars, when Britain’s “wooden walls,” its
warships, produced a high demand for wood, and a major source of timber was
lost with the independence of the United States. General inflation caused by
war may also have played a role.
If you had held onto
that 18 shilling copy, it would have proven to be a rather good investment, at
least for your heirs. In 2010, a first edition sold for £139,250 at
auction.
Goucher College’s
first edition of “Pride and Prejudice.”
139,250 pounds for a
single copy, and 20 million copies overall, for a novel Jane Austen made 110
pounds on. It bothers me. Pride and Prejudice has not belonged to her
since 1813, and it has not belonged to anyone since it entered the public
domain. In a way, this has been good—digital copies of the book are freely
available to readers. But it has been my experience that these digital copies
are poorly formatted, and, more critically, inaccurate. They have eroded
significantly from what was published in 1813, from the novel Jane Austen held
in her hands.
This was why I wanted
to create the restored edition, and why I wanted to price it for free on any
channel that would allow it, and at the minimum on any one that wouldn’t. (If
you’d like to help with this, please participate in my campaign to make it free on Amazon.) Pride and Prejudice belongs
to readers, now, but I want readers to experience it in Jane Austen’s true
voice, with the words and the punctuation as they were in 1813. So if you are
an ebook reader, I hope you will make your next reread of this beloved novel my
restored edition!
(Readers interested
in learning more about the original publication of Pride and Prejudice are
encouraged to read James Raven’s piece, “Book Production,” in the book Jane
Austen in Context, as well as this online article on early editions of Pride and
Prejudice by Sarah Ogar.)
Sophie Turner worked as an online editor before delving even more fully into the tech world. Writing, researching the Regency era, and occasionally dreaming about living in Britain are her escapes from her day job.
She was afraid of long series until she ventured upon Patrick O’Brian’s 20-book Aubrey-Maturin masterpiece, something she might have repeated five times through.
Alas, her Constant Love series is only planned to be seven books right now, and consists of A Constant Love, A Change of Legacies, and the in-progress A Season Lost.
She blogs about her writing endeavours at sophie-turner-acl.blogspot.com, where readers can find direction for the various social drawing-rooms across the Internet where she may be called upon.
Sophie Turner’s Links
Giveaway Time
Sophie is kindly giving away an ebook of Pride & Prejudice, by Jane Austen, Restored to the 1813 Egerton Edition and Annotated by Sophie Turner. To enter, just leave a comment on this post by the end of the day on Friday 22 September, ensuring that you leave me a way to contact you, in case you are the lucky winner.
Thank you so much to Sophie for stopping by and providing a giveaway. You can see previous posts on the blog tour here:
Blog Tour Schedule
Thank you, Sophie, for doing such a wonderful thing by restoring Jane's masterpiece to its original state. I'm sure she would be so pleased.
ReplyDeleteThanks for the chance to win a copy!
Pamh5230(at)yahoo(dot)com
Aww, thanks, Pamela! I like to think she would be pleased. :-)
DeleteI agree, Pam, I think Sophie's project of making available a digital edition that is as close to possible as the original is such a wonderful gift to us all.
DeleteSophie,what a fantastic thing for you to do,to take our beloved P&P and restore it using Jane's specific choice of words!!
ReplyDeleteI hope she's looking down on you with a smile upon her face,grateful for all your efforts! We certainly are!!
Cheers Ceri for this post in support of Sophie's efforts!
Thank you, Mary! I hope she is, too. :-)
DeleteI was so happy to support Sophie in this wonderful project, Mary.
DeleteHow delightful and I applaud you and your efforts to restore this to its original state. I can see by the photo how lovingly you treated the older edition. I was so touched by the consideration and reverence used to preserve the older edition. Thank you for all your hard work and dedication to Austen's work. Well done!!
ReplyDeleteThank you, J. W.! I can't claim credit for that, though -- that was Goucher College's setup for looking at old books. I was actually pretty amazed that I could just make an appointment and go work with a first edition of P&P.
DeleteThanks Jeanne! Sophie has gone to such pains with this project.
DeleteThank you so much for hosting me here and supporting this effort, Ceri!
ReplyDeleteI was very pleased to be able to support this project Sophie, and the fact that you've been trying to make it free, shows what a generous spirit you have been showing while trying to preserve a beloved work!
DeleteHopa, hopa, hopa that I win a copy. And I wish you well-deserved good sales as well, Sophie.
ReplyDeleteThank you, Maclaney! I actually wish that it wasn't sales and that Amazon would switch the book to free, but despite the many people who have reported it, they don't seem to be doing so.
DeleteGood luck Maclaney!
DeleteLove all the research you posted here and can't wait to see what this restored edition holds for us readers. Thanks Sophie Turner for all your hard work and thanks Ceri for featuring it here.
ReplyDeleteThank you, Jen! I hope you enjoy the restored edition.
DeleteThanks for stopping by Jen. It will be wonderful to read a version that's as close as possible to the version that the readers of the first edition enjoyed.
DeleteThank you for all your efforts in bringing this project to fruition. jadseah4 (at) yahoo (dot) com
ReplyDeleteYou're welcome, and thanks for your interest in it!
DeleteThanks Darcybennett!
DeleteI am still amazed with your dedication in this project
ReplyDeletedenise
Aww, thanks, Denise!
DeleteDedication is the word, Denise! Thanks for commenting.
DeleteSophie did the world a huge favor - I can't even wrap my mind around all the work and research she put into it. Thank you.
ReplyDeleteAww, thank you, Sheila! It was a lot of work but also a labor of love. :-)
DeleteThat's just how I feel about it, Sheila, it's a huge service for Austen Admirers worldwide.
DeleteIt is really interesting to me to think about how simple things like spelling and punctuation can change how a book is meant to be read. Thanks to Sophie for such an amazing job!
ReplyDeleteLeah Pruett
zinger393 at gmail dot com
Thank you so much, Leah! Yes those little things really can add up to make a big difference.
DeleteDefinitely, Leah, emphasis, spelling and punctuation all make a huge difference to the meaning!
Delete