Book Description
For Jane Austen, Edmund was a name the represented
heroism and chivalry, Maria signified heartlessness and Richard was a joke.
She had a weakness for Emma and a passion for
Frederick which endured from her earliest years until she bestowed it on her
last, and most romantic, hero.
Unlike most novelists of her period, in naming
her characters Jane Austen confined herself to the names found in everyday
life, choosing them to fit not only their personalities but their place in
society.
While the classic English names are her staple,
she also drew on the Old Testament for her low-born characters and
eighteenth-century creations for the would-be fashionable.
In this study of a hitherto neglected area of
the novelist’s art, Maggie Lane looks at the history of English nomenclature up
to Jane Austen’s time and at the naming patterns and practices current in her
society, including who was entitled to use the Christian name of whom.
A section on Jane Austen’s own taste in names is
followed by an alphabetical listing of all the Christian names used in her
mature fiction, with their history, social status and associations.
'Jane Austen and Names' is a must-read for
anyone interested in the great novelist.
Maggie Lane has written a number of books about different aspects of Jane Austen’s works, and this particular one looks at her character name choices, to see what, if anything, can be gleaned from the choices. The book lists the character first names alphabetically, and looks at what characters have each name.
One thing I think is particularly interesting is that although it’s generally accepted that Jane’s elder sister Cassandra was the person closest to her, I couldn’t think of any characters named Cassandra in her adult works (although it was also their mother’s name, which might have made a difference!) so I wanted to see whether there was a Cassandra that I was unaware of. There was a Cassandra in a very short story in Austen’s juvenilia, ‘The Beautifull Cassandra’, but no Cassandra in her adult works.
The other interesting name choice for me is Jane – there are a couple of Janes that spring to mind, namely the almost perfect Janes of Bennet and Fairfax, both of them beautiful and serene, and Jane Fairfax also very accomplished. I don’t think this naming could have been by accident – I really think that Austen was having a laugh with this name choice as even though Jane isn’t an uncommon name, surely for a character to share the author’s name must be a deliberate choice, but the author of this book doesn’t agree with me!
If we look at the other Austen siblings (James, George, Edward, Henry, Francis and Charles) I can think of examples of all their names being given to her characters.
So, what did I learn from this book? Firstly:
‘In the six published novels and three mature fragments which form the body of her work, Jane Austen uses 26 boys’ names and 55 girls’ names. These she repeats and distributed among the one hundred and fourteen male and one hundred and twenty-seven female characters on whom she bestows a Christian name.’
This is also an interesting point; that some characters aren’t given a first name – for some of those there are clues though, such as Mrs Norris’ god-daughter being named Elizabeth, perhaps for her god-mother? A lot of eldest girls are named after their mother, for example Maria Bertram and Fanny Price. So we could make a guess that Mrs Bennet could be a Jane too, although it always tickles me to think that Jane may have been named after another relative (like Anne de Bourgh being named after her aunt) and the second Bennet daughter was named after her mother, because then we would have two Elizabeth Bennets, very different from each other!
One character that isn’t given a first name is Pride & Prejudice’s Colonel Fitzwilliam, who is very often called Richard in JAFF (Jane Austen Fan Fiction), so much that it has become Richard in ‘Fanon’ (fan fic canon). The name Richard doesn’t seem to be an Austen favourite – being mocked in both Persuasion and Northanger Abbey where Catherine Norland’s father is described as ‘a very respectable man, though his name was Richard’. I am not convinced that Austen was a fan of Colonel Fitzwilliam, so maybe she would have been on board, who knows!
Maggie Lane points out that the use of a person’s first name was a significant marker of intimacy – this is useful information for the modern reader as although a contemporary reader of Austen would know what name usage signifies, a modern reader might just read on without noting the significance as it means nothing to us.
She also points out some things which I’d overlooked, such as names ending in an ‘a’ being bad news, and a general indicator for pretentious or shallow young women (Bertram sisters, Lydia Bennet etc.). Emma is about the only exception to this. It’s interesting how names might flag this sort of characteristic. On the flip side, Charlottes are very sensible.
I thought this was an
interesting read, and as it’s just basically a book listing names it’s an easy
read to pick up and put down and you could read it among other reads. This
author has written a number of books about Austen’s works and life which I’ve
been meaning to read for so long, and I’m pleased I’ve finally managed to read
one. I’d rate it as a 4 star read.
Jane Austen and Names is available to buy now in Kindle and Kindle Unlimited. It’s also available in paperback, but you’d probably have to pick it up second hand.
•
Amazon US • Amazon UK • Amazon CA • Add to Goodreads shelf
Note about comments: If you have any problems adding your comment please contact me and I will add your comment for you :)
No comments:
Post a Comment
If you're not logged in to Google please leave your name in your comment or it will post as anonymous. Thanks! - Ceri